Good evening, friends. Tonight, I’d like to shine a little light on two very different, yet equally remarkable men — both named William. One was Hollywood’s definition of urbane wit and grace; the other, the symbol of rugged postwar realism.
Let’s take a moment to look at William Powell and William Holden, two names that carried enormous weight in their respective eras, and ask ourselves — who was more successful, and who was the more talented actor?

William Powell — The Elegant Sophisticate

William Powell came into motion pictures at the tail end of the silent era and grew right along with Hollywood as sound revolutionized the business. His screen presence was unlike anyone else’s: polished, articulate, and always in complete control of the moment.

Powell found his defining role as the suave detective Nick Charles in The Thin Man (1934), where his quick wit and chemistry with Myrna Loy turned a detective story into one of the most delightful film series of its time. He and Loy made fourteen films together, and their partnership remains one of Hollywood’s most adored screen pairings.

He was also unforgettable in My Man Godfrey (1936) and Life with Father (1947), both earning him Academy Award nominations. In all, Powell received three Oscar nominations for Best Actor, a reflection of both his skill and consistency.

At the box office, he was a major draw throughout the 1930s and early ’40s, particularly in comedies and sophisticated dramas. Powell’s characters often represented intelligence and civility during an era when Hollywood celebrated class and charm. His legacy is that of the refined actor — the man who made it look easy.

William Holden — The Rugged Everyman

If Powell represented the elegance of prewar Hollywood, then William Holden was the face of the modern, conflicted man that followed. He emerged in the late 1930s and became a defining star of the 1950s, his career reflecting a shift toward realism and emotional depth.

Holden’s breakthrough came with Sunset Boulevard (1950), where his weary screenwriter narrating his own downfall perfectly captured the cynicism of postwar America. Three years later, he won the Academy Award for Best Actor for Stalag 17 (1953), playing a cynical prisoner of war who turns reluctant hero.

From there, he starred in some of Hollywood’s greatest productions: The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957), Sabrina (1954), The Wild Bunch (1969), Network (1976), and The Towering Inferno (1974). His characters were often flawed but deeply human, and his acting carried a kind of unvarnished authenticity that defined a new era of movie performance.

At the box office, Holden was a powerhouse. He ranked among the Top Ten Money-Making Stars for several consecutive years in the 1950s and even hit number one in 1956. He was one of the first major stars to negotiate a share of a film’s profits — earning millions from The Bridge on the River Kwai alone.

By the end of his career, Holden had earned multiple Oscar nominations and an Emmy Award, bridging film and television with the same quiet authority that made him a star.

🎞 Comparing the Two

The Question

So here we are — two Williams, two different kinds of magic.

William Powell, who made his audience feel like they were being invited to the smartest party in town — all charm, wit, and unflappable poise.
And William Holden, who peeled back the glamour and gave us something raw, believable, and entirely new — a man whose flaws made him unforgettable.

Both were box-office titans in their time. Both received Academy recognition. Both remain fixtures on lists of Hollywood’s most respected actors.

So I leave the question to you, just as I might at the end of a Turner Classic Movies segment:

Who do you believe was more successful — and more talented — William Powell or William Holden?

The gentleman of the champagne glass, or the man with the world-weary stare?

• watch William Powell and William Holden on Free Movie Classics (Roku | FireTV)